Response to Reviewers Reviewer
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
ارزیابی میزان دقت داوران یکی از مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی زبان در تشخیص اصلاحات مورد نیاز یک مقاله علمی ارسالی؛ سال 1389
Background and Objectives: Final corrections on a manuscript sent for publication in a scientific journal are suggested by reviewers. So this qualifies the paper with the least errors for publication. The present study aimed to assess the Persian language peer reviewers' comments on a manuscript sent to an Iranian Scientific Journal (journal of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences), 2010....
متن کاملAuthor’s response to reviews Title: Comparison of diagnostic methods for early interproximal caries detection with nearinfrared light transillumination: An in vivo study Authors: ismail
Reviewer#1 (Reviewer 1): The introduction is pertinent to the topic addressed. The methodology can be described more clearly to respond to what the study proposes. We’d like to thank and express our deep gratitude to the reviewer for his/her kind concern and effort for reviewing our manuscript. We agree with the reviewer completely. Several changes were made according to reviewers’ suggestions....
متن کاملAutomatizing the Assignment of the Submitted Manuscripts to Reviewers: A Systematic Review of Research Texts
Purpose: To systematicly review the automatazation of the assignment of the submitted manuscripts to reviewers in order to identify the status of research studies in this field in terms of types of evidence of expertise, types of retrieval models used, and the research gaps, and finally some suggestions for has been offered for future research. Method: The current research followed the systema...
متن کامل